Amber Heard 'recoils' after nearly crossing Johnny's path
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
The defamation trial between Johnny Depp, 58, and Amber Heard, 36, resumed on Monday and cross-examination of the actress began. Mr Depp’s lawyer, Camille Vasquez, 37, began questioning Ms Heard and addressed why the Pirates Of The Caribbean star has appeared to avoid looking at his ex-wife throughout the trial so far.
Ms Vasquez said: “Mr Depp has not looked at you once this entire trial, has he?”
Ms Heard responded: “Not that I have noticed, no.”
Mr Depp’s lawyer then questioned: “You know exactly why Mr Depp won’t look back at you, don’t you?”
“I do,” the actress replied.
Ms Vasquez continued: “He promised you, you would never see his eyes again.”
Ms Heard replied: “He cannot look at me. He can’t.”
Asked about her accusations that Mr Depp was an abuser, the Aquaman star continued: “He is an abuser… and you can look either of us up online and see who’s being abused.”
Ms Vasquez later played an audio clip of a 2016 meeting between the pair in San Francisco after Ms Heard filed for divorce and obtained a restraining order against Mr Depp.
Ms Heard could be heard saying: “Please I just want to hug you and say bye.”
Mr Depp responded: “We won’t see each other again.
“I’m going to take my f**king glasses off.
“You will not see my eyes again”
DON’T MISS
Will Smith asked Jada Pinket Smith to be present for kissing scenes[INSIGHT]
Rebekah Vardy was ‘more interested in taking selfies’ than football[LATEST]
Dan Walker spurned by Sally Nugent as she refuses to appear in video[NEWS]
His lawyer then probed Ms Heard: “He kept that promise hasn’t he?”
Mr Depp is suing Ms Heard over the op-ed she wrote for The Washington Post in 2018.
Ms Heard has countersued for $100 million, arguing that Depp smeared her by calling her a liar.
Her attorneys have argued that she told the truth and that her opinion was protected free speech under the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.
The trial continues.
Source: Read Full Article